Interactive Governance Map
LiveLOADING
Highest Scores — Federal
Members of the House of Commons with the highest Integrity Score.
Highest Scores — Provincial
Highest Integrity Scores among provincial legislatures. Scores are only comparable within a chamber, so this is a separate list, not a continuation of the federal one.
These are entry points, not the full ranking — see the leaderboard for every ranked member. Members with fewer than three published data streams are Unscored and are left out of both lists rather than shown with a substitute number.
About the governance map
This page pairs the riding-level choropleth with a set of representative cards, so you can move between the country-wide view and individual profiles without losing your place.
What is on this page
The map fills each electoral district with the Integrity Score of the member holding that seat, switching between the federal districts and a provincial view. The two lists beneath it mirror that split: the highest-scoring members of the House of Commons on one side, the highest-scoring members of the provincial legislatures on the other. They are separate lists on purpose — a score is only comparable within a chamber, so the two columns are not two halves of one ranking. Each row links through to the full record behind the score.
Both lists are drawn only from members who have a published score. A member shown as Unscored is absent from them rather than placed at the bottom, because missing data is not a low result.
If you want the whole ranking rather than a handful of cards, the leaderboard is the authoritative list, ordered by score within jurisdiction. If you want the map on its own with more room, use the Integrity Map.
Where the data comes from
Everything here is computed from records that governments already publish: financial disclosures filed with the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the provincial commissioners, recorded divisions from the House of Commons and the Ontario Legislative Assembly, committee roles, lobbying registries and procurement data. Federal riding boundaries come from the 2023 Representation Order published by Elections Canada.
The data behind this page is refreshed on a schedule rather than continuously, so treat it as the state of the sources at the last sync.
How to read it
- A grey district has no matched score, which is not the same as a low one. Members with fewer than three published data streams are shown as Unscored rather than graded on partial data, and several provinces publish neither divisions nor disclosures in a machine-readable form.
- Scores compare within a chamber, not across the country. Only the factors a member's legislature actually publishes are counted, so a federal MP and a provincial member are not being measured against the same set of feeds.
- A score summarises records, not character. Policy positions, competence and party affiliation are not inputs, and a conflict signal is a prompt to read the underlying filing rather than a finding.
Where the gaps are
We publish the state of every feed instead of hiding the uneven bits. Recorded-vote coverage is federal and Ontario only — elsewhere, divisions appear only inside Hansard PDFs. Most provincial lobbying registries are ingested normally, while the federal registry blocks automated access and is refreshed from a hand-mirrored export that can run stale. The current status of every feed, by jurisdiction, is on data coverage.