Blind trust
An arrangement under which a representative's controlled assets are managed by an independent trustee who does not take instruction from, or report holdings to, the representative.
What it means
Under the federal Conflict of Interest Act, reporting public office holders — ministers, parliamentary secretaries and certain appointees — may not hold controlled assets. Controlled assets are broadly those whose value can be affected by government decisions, publicly traded securities being the obvious case. The holder must either divest them outright or place them in a trust that meets the Act's conditions and is approved by the Ethics Commissioner.
The Act sets out what such a trust must look like, including that the trustee must be at arm's length from the office holder and that the office holder must not have any control over, or knowledge of, how the assets are managed. The office holder may not give the trustee instructions, and the trustee may not tell the office holder what the trust now holds.
The mechanism reduces conflict-of-interest risk without eliminating it, and the residue is worth being precise about. The office holder knows what was placed in the trust on the day it was created, so for as long as those assets plausibly remain, the knowledge has not gone away. The trustee is not anonymous. And the arrangement does nothing about interests that are not controlled assets at all.
Blind trusts are also a minister-level instrument. Ordinary members of the House who are not public office holders are not required to divest or place assets in trust; their obligation under the Members' Code is disclosure, and declaration or recusal where a private interest arises.
Provincial regimes have their own equivalents with their own thresholds and their own approval processes. Do not assume the federal conditions apply to a provincial minister's arrangement.
What a blind trust does and does not solve
Consider, illustratively, a minister who holds a portfolio of publicly traded shares on appointment and places them in an approved blind trust. From that day the minister cannot direct a trade and is not told what the trust buys or sells.
What is solved: the minister cannot trade on what they learn in cabinet, and cannot steer decisions toward a position they are actively managing. What is not solved: on day one they know exactly what went in. A trust is a control on future conduct, not an erasure of past knowledge — which is why the arrangement itself is disclosed rather than treated as the end of the matter.
How it shows up in our data
Where a member's public disclosure summary records a blind trust, that appears in the disclosure section of their profile alongside the rest of the filing, linked to the registry entry it came from.
We do not hold the contents of any trust, and neither does the public registry — that is the point of the arrangement. Nothing on this site should be read as describing what a trust currently holds.
Related on Integrity Index
Sources
- Conflict of Interest Act, s. 27 — divestment of controlled assets
- Conflict of Interest Act — full text
Last reviewed: